http://sexodelalma.blogspot.com/2009/09/hay-algo-de-repugnante-en-einstein-que.html
Fermat continue with our notes on the margins of books of others, Einstein did the favor of what is said in the link above and now here:
White Dwarf, those who could quietly cut the wood while the girl gave them the food bed, we dreaded the dust and cobwebs (never planned any work without all the host of sappers, in this case and all whores, that make it possible, but the merit is usually always take it that neither drop of blood spilled in the race) or Nosferatu, always seemed to us this "monster" example of humanity. Would other shit different the world we know with such examples?
says in an article entitled "What is the theory of relativity?": "It thermodynamics and attempts to determine relationships that meet the individual facts, from a fact of experience: it is impossible mobility life ".
the Universe was missing here, the job while the course for nothing but gray White slipper Cinderella without her cousin (forcing it, which stepmother, who also his own daughter that Einstein devoted his entire force neurons and other vital organs and creeping same task) I threw away the cobwebs and dust and I tried to perfect feeding the hour, she forgot the Universe, occupation, and tell him and his dance Shivat concentric circles if perpetual mobility, whether of the nature whatsoever, it is not possible.
But I will quote the whole paragraph, or better summarize, in which "Principle" could not agree more:
talks about the different kinds of theories that reduce to two: constructive and principled. And we agree on what he says there unless they called Constructive theories outlining a type of closed knowledge already understood (as it attaches to the thermodynamic or more precisely to the kinetic theory of gases), and surely knowledge are closed, something that has already been covered? Everything is open and unresponsive while essentially not been answered and less developed. Of course their stories are not essentially or substantially less understood and developed.
says: "The constructive theories have the advantages of clarity, integrity and adaptability. Those principles, integrity and security logic foundation. "
Well, I'm here in the" beginning "I see that both theories are the most" intact ", if that is true given the respectable work of those who strive, so I do not see the distinctions that he himself, but of course going to endorse their reports on the status of "theories of principle" because of "security grounds."
"Theory of Relativity is a theory of principles. To understand its nature must first understand the principles on which it is based. But above all I have to point out that a theory is like a building two floors. Being composed by the theory of relativity and the theory of general relativity. "
And let's not play with the meanings of the word principle saying that he would have been the best for your condition from person to examine the principles which it was based and use fewer people in their own benefit (do not forget that it was Einstein who spoke of identity between scientist and plagiarist, I do not remember his exact words on the same, and it was honored) and above all not to engage in what all his colleagues then and many now: vent his cruelty to the weaker, or rather what mistreated by society, women.
He he was so glad that the self-promotion, here calling his relativity theory that principles of "integrity logic" and "security grounds", you dislike the most that someone had dared to shatter his foundation and security both its logical integrity, which he did splendidly our physical (English) on the shin Palacios giving back to the question: Lorenzt transformations, these transformations do not change anything, because that stretch from one side of the issue (eg. space, or eg. time, as being stretched which in turn shrinks) it shrank before one of the sides of the same issue that is being referring to the expansion-shrinkage, space or time. Your security is groundless as resquebradiza, thus there is no possibility of any kind of integrity. Both floors of the theory of relativity, thank goodness we had two plants (but unfortunately all of physics is involved in these two plants as unsafe to inhabit) are therefore the most house of cards, and deep laughter that inspires some so seriously they have turned their physical malformations such as: geometric gravity, not only ruin everything physical base on what that light travels at a certain speed in a vacuum. Do we imagine a God so stupid or All That Is that what itself, constructing the building of the universe on any speed, even as the speed of light (and we see that there is so much "light" do not see, or its opposite matter)?
Theory of Relativity on two floors do not have a category other games, or entertainment, many have, or theories, physicists, they can never marry the quantum that at least no more balls based on observations, although there are also many little games here.
And all this, all the loss of "integrity logical" and "security reasons", we can thank the mathematics praised, they are always so useful in the accounting tricks, board games and construction of missiles would be used for something besides to "take action." Since Messrs. mathematics, physical play, I think we have a license, the words, play with them, "beginning", "integrity", "action."
TAKE ACTION. So the plot is what we should demand of physics if it is to talk about the Real or find their ways, not so much as to what Penrose Leon Lederman. Should take steps that its plot is taking action and not the creation of bestsellers IN SEARCH OF REALITY, as the loss of time, or wasting time. Should measure and weigh it with accelerators so expensive that costs us NOT TO HAVE CHANCE OF EXPRESSION, so many, and to stop eating a lot, or with the Weights and Measures as always, those weights and measures also laugh, and as with that of gibberish so brainy beings were mounted and no one was able to "cut the suit" to the "emperor" (it also indirectly Penrosian, clarify if not caught) to tell him that he was naked, like Newton and inertial mass or gravitational mystery to what would be the same! ! And just to me, so after admiring the words repeat the exclamation marks, the mystery seems that it should be a mystery of the same, or something relevant. To drop all at the same speed (or maybe .. Ironía. mystery: this must be related to speed of light that you always equal to itself if a vacuum in which everything and everyone we base our existence?, even though we see that the frequencies energy, is much here to say) if pushed atmospheric vacuum, as for the speed you take in his downfall does not matter its mass but the mass that makes acquiring, in this case Earth, it falls all at the same speed , and that it should ask meteorites as different sizes as those that destroyed the dinosaurs and 70 or 80% of the remaining species, or the planet that collided with ours back in the early solar system made it possible for the Moon (though I suppose that it would not have been possible to measure the rate of fall in our atmosphere), while the meteorite, fuck, that unfortunately looks with all the cars in the world, and a stone that fell from heaven to let me just scrapped mine!
leave, for now, smile, smile Einstein style of the lady who sent the letter to which we referred in our letter referenced by the link in the header, but with the difference that I dedicate myself to crush defenseless as cockroaches to young ladies, for me not for Einstein, respected intellects, but to try, poor me just try, crush and the same orthopteran and its "principles" at all Einstein, and throw me the larger. I am helpless iconoclastic and friends ladies, for my own friend and we do not have anyone else in our fan club.
And sing me a song of tenderness unprecedented 
0 comments:
Post a Comment